4.5 Article

High IDO-1 expression in tumor endothelial cells is associated with response to immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 109, 期 5, 页码 1583-1591

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13560

关键词

biomarker; IDO; immunotherapy; nivolumab; renal cell carcinoma

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nivolumab belongs to the standard therapy in the second-line setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although deep and long-lasting responses are seen in some patients, the majority of patients will further progress. PD-L1 is still under critical evaluation as a predictive biomarker. Thus, more accurate biomarkers are clearly warranted. Here, we investigated for the first time the predictive role of IDO-1, a negative immune-regulatory molecule, on clear cell RCC tissues of 15 patients undergoing nivolumab therapy. IDO-1 and other immune inhibitory molecules (PD-L1, PD-L2, FOXP3) as well as immune cell subsets (CD3, CD4 and CD8) were measured on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of RCC specimens by immunohistochemistry. IDO-1 was predominantly expressed in tumor endothelial cells, and was totally absent from tumor cells itself. IDO-1 overexpression (>10%) could be detected more frequently in responders (100%, n = 6/6) compared to non-responders (33.3%, n = 3/9; P = .028), resulting in a better progression-free survival during immunotherapy (IDO-1 10% vs >10%, median: 3.5 vs not estimated (NE) months, P = .01 by log-rank test). In addition, IDO-1 was positively correlated with CD8(+) T cell expression (r(s) = .691, P = .006). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was negative in 13 (86.7%) of 15 patients, irrespective of therapeutic response (responders vs non-responders: 83.3% vs 88.9%). No differences were noticed in the PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (PD-L1 < 1% in 66.7% of both responders and non-responders). In contrast to PD-L1, these results suggest that IDO-1 may be a more promising predictive biomarker for response to immune-based cancer therapy in mRCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据