4.8 Article

The Endosomal Protein CEMIP Links WNT Signaling to MEK1-ERK1/2 Activation in Selumetinib-Resistant Intestinal Organoids

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 16, 页码 4533-4548

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3149

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  2. Concerted Research Action Program (Bio-Acet) at the University of Liege
  3. Special Research Funds (FSR) at the University of Liege
  4. Belgian Foundation against Cancer [FAF-F/2016/794]
  5. Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and Biotechnology [WELBIO-CR-2015A-02]
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Fonds Leon Fredericq
  8. Centre Anticancereux of the CHU Liege

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MAPK signaling pathways are constitutively active in colon cancer and also promote acquired resistance to MEK1 inhibition. Here, we demonstrate that BRAFV600E-mutated colorectal cancers acquire resistance to MEK1 inhibition by inducing expression of the scaffold protein CEMIP through a beta-catenin-and FRA-1-dependent pathway. CEMIP was found in endosomes and bound MEK1 to sustain ERK1/2 activation in MEK1 inhibitor-resistant BRAFV600E-mutated colorectal cancers. The CEMIP-dependent pathway maintained c-Myc protein levels through ERK1/2 and provided metabolic advantage in resistant cells, potentially by sustaining amino acids synthesis. CEMIP silencing circumvented resistance to MEK1 inhibition, partly, through a decrease of both ERK1/2 signaling and c-Myc. Together, our data identify a cross-talk between Wnt and MAPK signaling cascades, which involves CEMIP. Activation of this pathway promotes survival by potentially regulating levels of specific amino acids via a Myc-associated cascade. Targeting this node may provide a promising avenue for treatment of colon cancers that have acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Significance: MEK1 inhibitor-resistant colorectal cancer relies on the scaffold and endosomal protein CEMIP to maintain ERK1/2 signaling and Myc-driven transcription. (C) 2018 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据