4.7 Article

Dicer reprograms stromal fibroblasts to a pro-inflammatory and tumor-promoting phenotype in ovarian cancer

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 415, 期 -, 页码 20-29

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.026

关键词

Dicer; Stromal fibroblast; Reprogram; Inflammation; Ovarian cancer

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81602284, 81372801, 81572570, 81502250, 81572725, 81772787]
  2. 973 Program of China [2015CB553903]
  3. National Science-technology Supporting Plan Projects [2015BAI13B05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammation and host stromal activation contribute significantly to ovarian cancer (OC) initiation and malignant progression. However, the complex reciprocal interactions between them are largely unknown. Here, we discovered that the tumor suppressor gene Dicer was paradoxically overexpressed in ovarian tumor stroma, and induced fibroblast activation and stromal inflammation. Dicer transformed normal fibroblasts to a carcinoma-associated fibroblast (CAF)-like state, which was morphologically spread out and functionally activated to fuel tumor invasion and metastasis. Attenuation of Dicer hampered CAF characteristics, diminished stromal inflammation and the role of fibroblasts in supporting tumor growth. Moreover, Dicer drove the expression of an inflammatory signature in fibroblasts that could be used to discriminate normal and cancerous stroma and predict the survival of patients with OC. Finally, the nuclear factor is B (NF kappa B) signaling was demonstrated to be responsible for Dicer effect on fibroblast activation and stromal inflammation, through microRNA (miR)-6780b. Our study represents the first report that characterizes Dicer expression and function in the tumor stroma, and highlights its pro-metastatic role in this context. Additionally, we suggest that the Dicer-miR6780b-NF kappa B cascade is an attractive target of choice in stroma-oriented OC therapy. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据