3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Physico-Chemical Analysis of Coconut Shell Powder

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.proche.2015.12.045

关键词

Coconut shell powder; lignin; laser diffraction; thermogravimetric analysis; scanning electron microscopy; atomic absorption spectroscopy; FTIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coconut is a major plantation crop of Sri Lanka and coconut millers are striving to add value to coconut shells being generated as an agricultural waste material. A leading coconut miller is mechanically grinding the shells into powder to be used by industry as a filler material or in any other way that would add value. In this study the coconut shell powder (CSP) has been analysed both physically and chemically to have a better understanding of the material its properties. Laser diffraction showed a broad distribution of sizes with a mean particle size of 34.2 microns, and by using scanning electron microscopy it was possible to recognize a variety of sizes, shapes and structures. The thermo-chemical character of CSP was studied over a temperature range of 30 degrees C - 800 degrees C using a thermogravimetric analyser. CSP was seen to pyrolyse best between 220 degrees C - 380 degrees C with a residue of 16.2% left at the end of the pyrolysis. In order to understand the thermo-chemical behavior of CSP more fully and to estimate the chemical composition, the lignin content was determined by the ASTM D 1106 - 96 method and a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and a differential thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) were done on the lignin as well. The CSP was pyrolysed at 550 degrees C to determine the ash content and using atomic absorption spectroscopy the types of metal in ash were determined. Apart from silica which could not be measured, sodium, potassium, zinc, calcium and iron were found to be the main metals. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for a better understanding of the chemical structure of CSP. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据