4.7 Review

FLASH DROUGHTS A Review and Assessment of the Challenges Imposed by Rapid-Onset Droughts in the United States

期刊

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0149.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA Climate Program Office (CPO) Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections program [NA14OAR4310226]
  2. NOAA CPO Sectoral Applications Research Program [NA16OAR4310130, NA13OAR4310122]
  3. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2013-69002-23146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the increasing use of the term flash drought by the media and scientific community, it is prudent to develop a consistent definition that can be used to identify these events and to understand their salient characteristics. It is generally accepted that flash droughts occur more often during the summer owing to increased evaporative demand; however, two distinct approaches have been used to identify them. The first approach focuses on their rate of intensification, whereas the second approach implicitly focuses on their duration. These conflicting notions for what constitutes a flash drought (i.e., unusually fast intensification vs short duration) introduce ambiguity that affects our ability to detect their onset, monitor their development, and understand the mechanisms that control their evolution. Here, we propose that the definition for flash drought should explicitly focus on its rate of intensification rather than its duration, with droughts that develop much more rapidly than normal identified as flash droughts. There are two primary reasons for favoring the intensification approach over the duration approach. First, longevity and impact are fundamental characteristics of drought. Thus, short-term events lasting only a few days and having minimal impacts are inconsistent with the general understanding of drought and therefore should not be considered flash droughts. Second, by focusing on their rapid rate of intensification, the proposed flash drought definition highlights the unique challenges faced by vulnerable stakeholders who have less time to prepare for its adverse effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据