4.2 Article

Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and biopolymer nanocomposites: a comparative study on physico-chemical, antimicrobial and anticancer activity

期刊

BULLETIN OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12034-018-1567-5

关键词

Biogenic silver nanoparticles; biopolymer nanocomposites; nanoparticles stability; antimicrobial activity; anticancer activity

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic-NPU Program I [LO1504]
  2. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [2/0124/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current report was intended towards comparative study of green-synthesized biogenic Rhubarb silver nanoparticles (RS-AgNPs) and chitosan crosslinked silver nanocomposites (CSHD-AgNCs). The physico-chemical characterization was done by UV-visible, FTIR, scanning electron microscopy (SUM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), TGA, XRD and zeta potential(zeta). The analysis and spectroscopic characterization was done by SEM and TEM and their results reveal that the nanoparticles are spherical in shape, with average size ranges from 5 to 50 nm, and was gathered by face centered cubic (FCC) structure throughout the polymer matrix and stable without any protecting or capping reagents over 450 days. The antimicrobial property of RS-AgNPs and CSHD-AgNCs (zeta = +29.6 and +32.8 mV) was evaluated against E. coli and S. aureus and showed an effective inhibitory property. The RS-AgNPs and CSHD-AgNCs were assessed for their anticancer activity against HeLa cell line by MTT method, and it reveals a dose response activity, time and cell line-dependent cytotoxicity. Based on the results obtained, the RS-AgNPs exhibited higher toxicity over CSHD-AgNCs after 24 h incubation of HeLa cells with different concentrations and is negligible for the aqueous Rhubarb extract. It was concluded that the changes in anticancer activity towards HeLa cells due to biological activity of silver nanoparticles depend on their method of biosynthesis and their physico-chemical nature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据