4.6 Article

Identification of movement characteristics and causal factors of the Shuping landslide based on monitored displacements

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-018-1237-2

关键词

Shuping landslide; Monitored displacement; Reservoir water level drawdown; Rainfall

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1501301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [41572278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data from in situ monitoring of displacement is of fundamental importance, not only in hazard assessments, but also for understanding the deformation mechanisms of landslides. However, acquiring reliable and continuous displacement data from complex landslides is often a problem because of the high cost of instruments and maintenance. Among more than 250 dangerous landslides monitored in the Chinese Three Gorges reservoir area, the most systematic and complete monitoring data have been obtained from the Shuping landslide. A ten-year record of GPS displacements measured in eight different locations, plus rainfall and reservoir level data, are utilised to identify the movement characteristics and causal factors of the Shuping landslide. The cumulative displacement curves show a series of abrupt increases that occur every year and are separated by periods of steady, slower deformations. The maximum cumulative displacement that occurred during the ten-year monitoring period was 4.7m at site SP-2. The maximum displacement rate was 35mm/day, which was observed on June 13, 2012 at site ZG86. Causal factors of the Shuping landslide are identified through qualitative comparisons of the monitoring data and cross-examined by grey correlation degree analysis. The results show that reservoir water level drawdown is the main factor accelerating the movement of the Shuping landslide, with heavy rainfall playing a subordinate role. The proposed use of field data and analytical methods has the potential for providing procedures and solutions for the interpretation of landslide monitoring data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据