4.7 Article

Mapping sky, tree, and building view factors of street canyons in a high-density urban environment

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 155-167

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.042

关键词

View factor; Google Street View; Deep learning; Street trees; Street canyon; High density

资金

  1. Global Scholarship Programme for Research Excellence from The Chinese University of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

View factors for sky, trees, and buildings are three important parameters of the urban outdoor environment that describe the geometrical relationship between different surfaces from the perspective of radiative energy transfer. This study develops an approach for accurately estimating sky view factor (SW), tree view factor (TVF), and building view factor (BVF) of street canyons in the high-density urban environment of Hong Kong using publicly available Google Street View (GSV) images and a deep-learning algorithm for extraction of street features (sky, trees, and buildings). As a result, SW, TVF, and BVF maps of street canyons are generated. Verification using reference data of hemispheric photography from field surveys in compact high-rise and low-rise areas shows that the GSV-based VF estimates have a satisfying agreement with the reference data (all with R-2 > 0.95), suggesting the effectiveness and high accuracy of the developed method. This is the first reported use of hemispheric photography for direct verification in a GSV-based streetscape study. Furthermore, a comparison between GSV-based and 3D-GIS-based SVFs shows that the two SW estimates are significantly correlated (R-2 = 0.40, p < 0.01) and show better agreement in high-density areas. However, the latter overestimates SW by 0.11 on average, and the differences between them are significantly correlated with street trees (R-2 = 0.53): the more street trees, the larger the difference. This suggests that a lack of street trees in a 3D-GIS model of street environments is the dominant factor contributing to the large discrepancies between the two datasets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据