4.7 Article

Human responses to high air temperature, relative humidity and carbon dioxide concentration in underground refuge chamber

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 53-62

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.038

关键词

Underground refuge chamber; Human response; CO2 concentration; High relative humidity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378426, 51678488, 51708551]
  2. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of Sichuan Province of Building Environment and Energy Efficiency [2015TD0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In underground confined spaces with a crowded population, the thermal environment will be hot-humid and occurred with high CO2 concentration. Investigating the combined effect of increased temperature, relative humidity and CO2 concentration on human responses is important for confined spaces. In this paper, 32 subjects were exposed to different combinations of air temperature (TO, relative humidity (RH) and CO2 concentrations in an underground climate chamber, with thermal response, physiological response and acute health symptoms being investigated. Results show that: at a T-a of 28 degrees C, RH of 65% and CO2 level of 12,000 ppm, thermal sensation votes (TSV) and thermal acceptability (TA) did not significantly changed, while a significant change was recorded with a RH of 85%. When CO2 concentration increased to 8000 ppm, the subjects' perceived air quality acceptability significantly decreased at T-a of 33 degrees C, however it did not significantly change at T-a of 28 degrees C and RH of 65%. Maximum mean skin temperature and wetness difference did not exceed 0.3 degrees C and 0.15 units between the different exposure conditions, respectively. Significant changes of headaches were observed when CO2 concentrations increased to 12,000 ppm at a RH of 85%, but the difference was not statistically significant at a RH of 65%. This indicated that the combined effects of high T-a, RH and CO2 concentration lead to different human responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据