4.7 Article

Window-opening behavior in Chinese residential buildings across different climate zones

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 234-243

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.030

关键词

Window opening; Occupant behavior; Building energy; Thermal comfort; Indoor air quality

资金

  1. national key project of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China, on Green Buildings and Building Industrialization [2016YFC0700500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Window-opening behavior significantly influences indoor air quality (IAQ), energy consumption, and thermal comfort in residential buildings with natural ventilation. To understand window-opening behavior in Chinese residential buildings, this study conducted a one-year measurement in 58 apartments in 14 cities across five different climate zones in China. The influences of climate region, season, household type, and weekday/weekend pattern on the interaction between occupants and windows were analyzed and presented. The average daily open-window duration in Chinese bedrooms was 9.4 h. Generally, the length of time that the windows were open in cold regions was shorter than that in warm regions, even when the outdoor air temperatures among regions were similar. The open-window duration increased from winter to summer, as the outdoor air temperature increased. However, the duration decreased when the mean daily outdoor air temperature reached around 27 degrees C. Approximately 40% of the window-opening actions occurred in the morning from 6:00 to 9:00. During working hours (9:00-17:00) on weekdays, windows were opened more frequently if non-working persons were in the house. On weekends, residents opened windows at a later time than on weekdays. On the basis of the acquired information, a typical window-operation schedule as occupant behavior was proposed for Chinese bedrooms. It provides a more accurate boundary condition for analyses of IAQ, energy consumption, and thermal comfort in Chinese residential buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据