An oral DNA vaccine against infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) encapsulated in alginate microspheres induces dose-dependent immune responses and significant protection in rainbow trout (Oncorrhynchus mykiss)

Administered by intramuscular injection, a DNA vaccine (pIRF1A-G) containing the promoter regions upstream of the rainbow trout interferon regulatory factor 1A gene (IRF1A) driven the expression of the infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) glycoprotein (G) elicited protective immune responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). However, less laborious and cost-effective routes of DNA vaccine delivery are required to vaccinate large numbers of susceptible farmed fish. In this study, the pIRF1A-G vaccine was encapsulated into alginate microspheres and orally administered to rainbow trout. At 1, 3, 5, and 7 d post-vaccination, IHNV G transcripts-were detected by quantitative real-time PCR in gills, spleen, kidney and intestinal tissues of vaccinated fish. This result suggested that the encapsulation of pIRF1A-G in alginate microparticles protected the DNA vaccine from degradation in the fish stomach and ensured vaccine early delivery to the hindgut, vaccine passage through the intestinal mucosa and its distribution thought internal and external organs of vaccinated fish. We also observed that the oral route required approximately 20-fold more plasmid DNA than the injection route to induce the expression of significant levels of IHNV G transcripts in kidney and spleen of vaccinated fish. Despite this limitation, increased IFN-1, TLR-7 and IgM gene expression was detected by qRT-PCR in kidney of vaccinated fish when a 10 mu g dose of the oral pIRF1A-G vaccine was administered. In contrast, significant Mx-1, Vig-1, Vig-2, TLR-3 and TLR-8 gene expression was only detected when higher doses of pIRF1A-G (50 and 100 mu g) were orally administered. The pIRF1A-G vaccine also induced the expression of several markers of the adaptive immune response (CD4, CD8, IgM and IgT) in kidney and spleen of immunized fish in a dose-dependent manner. When vaccinated fish were challenged by immersion with live IHNV, evidence of a dose response effect of the oral vaccine could also be observed. Although the protective effects of the oral pIRF1A-G vaccine after a challenge with IHNV were partial, significant differences in cumulative percent mortalities among the orally vaccinated fish and the unvaccinated or empty-plasmid vaccinated fish were observed. Similar levels of protection were obtained after the intramuscular administration of 5 mu g of pIRF1A-G or after the oral administration of a high dose of pIRF1A-G vaccine (100 mu g); with 70 and 56 relative percent survival values, respectively. When fish were vaccinated with alginate microspheres containing high doses of the pIRF1A-G vaccine (50 or 100 14), a significant increase in the production of anti-IHNV antibodies was detected in serum samples of the vaccinated fish compared with that in unvaccinated fish. At 10 days post challenge, IHNV N gene expression was nearly undetectable in kidney and spleen of orally vaccinated fish which suggested that the vaccine effectively reduced the amount of virus in tissues of vaccinated fish that survived the challenge. In conclusion, our results demonstrated a significant increase in fish immune responses and resistance to an IHNV infection after the oral administration of increasing concentrations of a DNA vaccine against IHNV encapsulated into alginate microspheres. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.