4.7 Article

Sustained plasma hepcidin suppression and iron elevation by Anticalin-derived hepcidin antagonist in cynomolgus monkey

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 175, 期 7, 页码 1054-1065

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.14143

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pieris Therapeutics
  2. European Commission [HEALTH-F4-2011-278408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) has been linked to iron-restricted erythropoiesis imposed by high circulating levels of hepcidin, a 25 amino acid hepatocyte-derived peptide that controls systemic iron homeostasis. Here, we report the engineering of the human lipocalin-derived, small protein-based anticalin PRS-080 hepcidin antagonist with high affinity and selectivity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Anticalin- and hepcidin-specific pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic modelling (PD) was used to design and select the suitable drug candidate based on t(1/2) extension and duration of hepcidin suppression. The development of a novel free hepcidin assay enabled accurate analysis of bioactive hepcidin suppression and elucidation of the observed plasma iron levels after PRS-080-PEG30 administration in vivo. KEY RESULTS PRS-080 had a hepcidin-binding affinity of 0.07nM and, after coupling to 30kD PEG (PRS-080-PEG30), a t(1/2) of 43h in cynomolgus monkeys. Dose-dependent iron mobilization and hepcidin suppression were observed after a single i.v. dose of PRS-080-PEG30 in cynomolgus monkeys. Importantly, in these animals, suppression of free hepcidin and subsequent plasma iron elevation were sustained during repeated s.c. dosing. After repeated dosing and followed by a treatment-free interval, all iron parameters returned to pre-dose values. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS In conclusion, we developed a dose-dependent and safe approach for the direct suppression of hepcidin, resulting in prolonged iron mobilization to alleviate iron-restricted erythropoiesis that can address the root cause of ACD. PRS-080-PEG30 is currently in early clinical development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据