4.6 Article

Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 102, 期 7, 页码 855-862

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311266

关键词

myopia; macular degeneration; prevalence; visual impairment; blindness

资金

  1. Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose We used systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and assimilate evidence quantifying blindness and visual impairment (VI) associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD), then derived models to predict global patterns. The models were used to estimate the global prevalence of blindness and VI associated with MMD from 2000to2050. Methods Thesystematic review identified 17 papers with prevalence data for MMD VI fitting our inclusion criteria. Data from six papers with age-specific data were scaled to relative age-dependent risk and meta-analysed at VI and blindness levels. We analysed variance in all MMD VI and blindness data as a proportion of high myopia against variables from the place and year of data collection, with a model based on health expenditure providing the best correlation. We used this model to estimate theprevalence and number of people with MMD VI in each country in each decade. Results We included data from 17 studies comprising 137514 participants. We estimated 10.0million people had VI from MMD in 2015 (prevalence 0.13%, 95%CI5.5to23.7 million, 0.07%to0.34%), 3.3million of whom were blind (0.04%, 1.8 to 7.8 million, 0.03%to0.10%). We estimate thatby 2050, without changing current interventions, VI from MMD will grow to 55.7million people (0.57%, 29.0to119.7million, 0.33%to1.11%), 18.5million of whom will be blind (0.19%, 9.6to39.7million, 0.11%to0.37%). Conclusion The burden of MMD blindness and VI will rise significantly without efforts to reduce the development and progression of myopia and improve themanagement of MMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据