4.6 Article

Safety of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 179, 期 3, 页码 615-622

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16724

关键词

-

资金

  1. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, U.S.A.
  2. Merck Co., Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundShort-term interleukin-23p19 inhibition by tildrakizumab improves plaque psoriasis and appears to be well tolerated. ObjectivesSafety and tolerability were assessed for up to 64 weeks of tildrakizumab therapy using pooled data from three randomized controlled trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. MethodsData pools for the placebo-controlled (up to 16 weeks) and full trial periods (up to 64 weeks) were analysed (n = 2081). ResultsIn the placebo-controlled period, frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; range 479-540%), serious TEAEs (range 14-23%), discontinuations due to AEs (range 06-19%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; range 00-01%) and severe infections (range 00-03%) were comparable between tildrakizumab 100 mg, tildrakizumab 200 mg, placebo and etanercept. In the full trial period, exposure-adjusted rates (patients per 100 patient-years) for TEAEs, serious TEAEs and discontinuations due to AEs with tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg were lower than or comparable with the placebo rates, and lower than with etanercept. Exposure-adjusted rates of MACEs (range 00-05) and severe infections (range 09-20) were comparable among groups. No TEAEs of inflammatory bowel disease or suicide were reported. Candida skin infections were infrequent at frequencies of 01%, 03%, 00% and 00% for the tildrakizumab 100 mg, tildrakizumab 200 mg, placebo and etanercept groups, respectively, in the placebo-controlled period, and exposure-adjusted rates of 02, 07, 00 and 00, respectively, in the full trial period. Oral candidiasis was also infrequent. ConclusionsUp to 64 weeks of tildrakizumab was well tolerated, with low rates of serious TEAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, and AEs of clinical interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据