4.6 Article

Anthropometric factors and Breslow thickness: prospective data on 2570 cases of cutaneous melanoma in the population-based Janus Cohort

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 179, 期 3, 页码 632-641

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16825

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Cancer Society [5829980-2014]
  2. Cancer Registry of Norway Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundBreslow thickness is the most important prognostic factor of localized cutaneous melanoma (CM), but associations with anthropometric factors have been sparsely and incompletely investigated. ObjectivesTo examine prediagnostic body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and height, weight and weight change in relation to Breslow thickness, overall and by anatomical site and histological subtype; and to assess possible nonlinear associations between these anthropometric factors and Breslow thickness. MethodsCMs in the Janus Cohort were identified between 1972 and 2014. Linear regression was used to estimate geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Breslow thickness with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) according to anthropometric factors. Restricted cubic splines in generalized linear models predicted adjusted mean Breslow thickness, and were used to assess possible nonlinear relationships. ResultsOf 2570 cases of CM, obese patients had a GMR of 116 (95% CI 104-130) of Breslow thickness vs. normal-weight patients. For BSA and weight, quintile 5 showed GMRs of 113 (95% CI 100-127) and 117 (95% CI 103-133) of Breslow thickness vs. quintile 1, respectively. Associations seemed restricted to superficial spreading melanomas and CMs on the trunk and lower limbs. The associations plateaued at an adjusted mean Breslow thickness of about 25 mm (BMI 29 kg m(-2), BSA 205 m(2) and weight 90 kg), before declining for the highest values. No associations were found for height and weight change. ConclusionsThis large case-series of incident CM demonstrated positive associations between BMI, BSA, weight and Breslow thickness, and suggested that behavioural or other mechanisms apply at high values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据