4.5 Article

Safety and efficacy of parenteral iron in children with inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 694-699

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13493

关键词

ferric carboxymaltose; intravenous iron; iron deficiency anaemia; iron sucrose; paediatric

资金

  1. Falk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsIron deficiency anaemia frequently complicates inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children and adults. Oral iron may exacerbate gastrointestinal symptoms and absorption may be insufficient in intestinal inflammation. Even where oral iron is successful, repletion of iron stores can be unacceptably slow. Intravenous iron compounds were in the past associated with serious adverse reactions and historically were considered a last resort in children. New generation preparations have a safer profile in adults, although reluctance to use them in children may persist, where safety data are lacking. We investigate the safety and efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose in children. MethodsWe retrospectively identified all children with IBD who received parenteral iron over a 38-month period in a single regional referral centre. Safety, tolerability and adverse events were established by case note review. Efficacy was assessed by change in haematinic indices pre- and post-treatment. ResultsForty-one children (18 male; median age 14years, range 3-17) received a total of 104 iron infusions. Of these, 44% (18) had Crohn's disease; 56% (23) ulcerative colitis. Thirty-five received ferric carboxymaltose, seven iron sucrose and one both. Three children developed mild rash post infusion which resolved quickly with chlorphenamine. Mean increase in haemoglobin was 2.5gdl(-1) (0.3-5.8). Iron levels increased by a mean of 8.4gdl(-1) (1-25), transferrin saturation by 16.2% (2-47). Transferrin decreased by 0.84gdl(-1) (0.3-3.4). ConclusionsNew generation parenteral iron preparations are safe, well tolerated and efficacious in children with iron deficiency anaemia and IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据