4.7 Article

A core matrisome gene signature predicts cancer outcome

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 435-440

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.458

关键词

cancer; extracellular matrix; matrisome; prognosis; gene signature

类别

资金

  1. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [SGL016\\1004] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Cancer Research UK [11563, 20407] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2014-13-002] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Cancer Research UK [11563] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Accumulating evidence implicates the tumour stroma as an important determinant of cancer progression but the protein constituents relevant for this effect are unknown. Here we utilised a bioinformatics approach to identify an extracellular matrix (ECM) gene signature overexpressed in multiple cancer types and strongly predictive of adverse outcome. Methods: Gene expression levels in cancers were determined using Oncomine. Geneset enrichment analysis was performed using the Broad Institute desktop application. Survival analysis was performed using KM plotter. Survival data were generated from publically available genesets. Results: We analysed ECM genes significantly upregulated across a large cohort of patients with ovarian, lung, gastric and colon cancers and defined a signature of nine commonly upregulated genes. Each of these nine genes was considerably overexpressed in all the cancers studied, and cumulatively, their expression was associated with poor prognosis across all data sets. Further, the gene signature expression was associated with enrichment of genes governing processes linked to poor prognosis, such as EMT, angiogenesis, hypoxia, and inflammation. Conclusions: Here we identify a nine-gene ECM signature, which strongly predicts outcome across multiple cancer types and can be used for prognostication after validation in prospective cancer cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据