4.5 Article

Molecular Markers of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment among Mexican Americans

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 221-228

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150553

关键词

Amnestic; biomarker; Mexican American; mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [AG039389, AG12300]
  2. Hogg Foundation for Mental Health [JRG-149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mexican Americans face a significant health disparity when it comes to Alzheimer's disease (AD) as they present with higher rates of the disease and develop AD at an earlier age compared to other ethnic groups. Recent work identified a proteomic profile of AD among this population; however, no work to date has sought to examine the biological profile of pre-AD among Mexican Americans. Objective: This study aims to identify an amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) proteomic profile among Mexican Americans. Methods: Data were analyzed from 284 Mexican American participants (aMCI, n=73; normal controls, n=211) from the Health & Aging Brain among Latino Elders study. Fasting serum samples were analyzed using a multi-plex biomarker assay platform. A biomarker profile was generated using random forest analyses. Results: Among aMCI cases, the biomarker profile was found to be largely inflammatory with the top three markers shown to include TNRi, IL10, and TARC. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers in detecting aMCI was 96% (sensitivity = 0.82; specificity = 0.97). Inclusion of clinical variables with the selected biomarkers did not impact the overall detection accuracy (area under the curve = 0.96) but led to a slight improvement in specificity (specificity = 0.99) and decrease in sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.74). Conclusion: The biomarker profile of aMCI was shown to be different from our previously generated AD profile among Mexican Americans, which was largely metabolic in nature. The findings implicate a possible interplay between inflammatory and metabolic processes and additional work is needed to further examine this.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据