4.6 Article

Persistent alteration in behavioural reactivity to a mild social stressor in rhesus monkeys repeatedly exposed to sevoflurane in infancy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 761-767

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.014

关键词

anaesthetic neurotoxicity; cognitive development; general anaesthesia

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Child Health and Development [R01-HD068388]
  2. NIH/Office [P51-OD011132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Socio-emotional development is the expression and management of emotions, which in non-human primates can be examined using responses toward increasing levels of threat. Damage to the limbic system alters socio-emotional development in primates. Thus, neuronal and glial cell loss caused by exposure to general anaesthesia early in infancy might also impact socio-emotional development. We recently reported that repeated sevoflurane exposure in the first month of life alters emotional behaviours at 6 months of age and impairs visual recognition memory after the first year of life in rhesus monkeys. The present study evaluated socio-emotional behaviour at 1 and 2 yr of age in those same monkeys to determine the persistence of altered emotional behaviour. Methods: Rhesus monkeys of both sexes were exposed to sevoflurane anaesthesia three times for 4 h each time in the first 6 weeks of life. At 1 and 2 yr of age, they were tested on the human intruder task, a well-established mild acute social stressor. Results: Monkeys exposed to sevoflurane as infants exhibited normal fear and hostile responses, but exaggerated self-directed ( displacement) behaviours, a general indicator of stress and anxiety in non-human primates. Conclusions: Early repeated sevoflurane exposure in infant non-human primates results in an anxious phenotype that was first detected at 6 months, and persists for at least 2 yr of age. This is the first demonstration of such a prolonged impact of early anaesthesia exposure on emotional reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据