4.2 Article

Reclassification of 400 consecutive glioma cases based on the revised 2016WHO classification

期刊

BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 81-89

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-018-0313-4

关键词

Glioma; WHO; Classification; Molecular diagnosis; IDH; TERT

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17K10868, 16K10779, 17K16652]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K10868, 16K10779, 16K20015, 17K16652] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we reclassified 400 consecutive glioma cases including pediatric cases, using the revised 2016 WHO classification with samples collected from the Kyushu University Brain Tumor Bank. The IDH1/2, H3F3A, key genetic markers in the 2016 classification, were analyzed using high-resolution melting, with DNA extracted from frozen tissues. The 1p/19q codeletions were evaluated using a microsatellite-based loss of heterozygosity analysis, with 18 markers, to detect loss of the entire chromosome arm. In the integrated diagnosis, 29 oligodendroglioma cases and 28 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted, while 2 oligodendroglioma cases and 5 anaplastic oligodendroglioma cases were diagnosed as not otherwise specified (NOS). These NOS cases were either IDH-mutants or 1p/19q-codeleted, although characteristic oligodendroglial features were evident histologically. Better overall survival of patients with oligodendroglioma correlated with the molecular characteristic of IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted, rather than the WHO grade. Eleven glioblastoma, IDH-wild-type cases were classified as 1p/19q-codeleted, however, chromosome 10 loss was also detected in 10 out of 11 cases. The 2016 WHO criteria for glioma classification leads to better diagnosis of patients. However, there are technical pitfalls and problems to be solved in the molecular analysis of routine diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据