4.7 Article

Second Einstein Telescope mock data and science challenge: Low frequency binary neutron star data analysis

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 93, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.024018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  2. Observatoire de la Cote dAzur
  3. PACA region
  4. NSF [PHY-1454389]
  5. LIGO Visitor Program through the National Science Foundation [PHY-0757058]
  6. Max-Planck Institute of Gravitational Physics, Potsdam, Germany
  7. STFC grant [ST/J000345/1]
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000342/1 Gravitational Waves, ST/J000345/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/J000345/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Einstein Telescope is a conceived third-generation gravitational-wave detector that is envisioned to be an order of magnitude more sensitive than advanced LIGO, Virgo, and Kagra, which would be able to detect gravitational-wave signals from the coalescence of compact objects with waveforms starting as low as 1 Hz. With this level of sensitivity, we expect to detect sources at cosmological distances. In this paper we introduce an improved method for the generation of mock data and analyze it with a new low-latency compact binary search pipeline called gstlal. We present the results from this analysis with a focus on low-frequency analysis of binary neutron stars. Despite compact binary coalescence signals lasting hours in the Einstein Telescope sensitivity band when starting at 5 Hz, we show that we are able to discern various overlapping signals from one another. We also determine the detection efficiency for each of the analysis runs conducted and show a proof of concept method for estimating the number signals as a function of redshift. Finally, we show that our ability to recover the signal parameters has improved by an order of magnitude when compared to the results of the first mock data and science challenge. For binary neutron stars we are able to recover the total mass and chirp mass to within 0.5% and 0.05%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据