4.3 Article

A Time-Varying Connectivity Analysis from Distributed EEG Sources: A Simulation Study

期刊

BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 721-737

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-018-0621-3

关键词

Multivariate autoregressive (MVAR)modeling; Kalman filtering; Partial directed coherence (PDC); EEG source modeling; Visual spatial attention network

资金

  1. Klinisch Onderzoeksfonds UZ Leuven
  2. FWO Clinical PhD fellowship [1701413N]
  3. KU Leuven Grant [OT/12/097]
  4. FWO [G0A0913N, G093616N]
  5. FederaalWetenschapsbeleid Belspo Inter-University Attraction Pole Grant [P7/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time-varying connectivity analysis based on sources reconstructed using inverse modeling of electroencephalographic (EEG) data is important to understand the dynamic behaviour of the brain. We simulated cortical data from a visual spatial attention network with a time-varying connectivity structure, and then simulated the propagation to the scalp to obtain EEG data. Distributed EEG source modeling using sLORETA was applied. We compared different dipole (representing a source) selection strategies based on their time series in a region of interest. Next, we estimated multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) parameters using classical Kalman filter and general linear Kalman filter approaches followed by the calculation of partial directed coherence (PDC). MVAR parameters and PDC values for the selected sources were compared with the ground-truth. We found that the best strategy to extract the time series of a region of interest was to select a dipole with time series showing the highest correlation with the average time series in the region of interest. Dipole selection based on power or based on the largest singular value offer comparable alternatives. Among the different Kalman filter approaches, the use of a general linear Kalman filter was preferred to estimate PDC based connectivity except when only a small number of trials are available. In the latter case, the classical Kalman filter can be an alternative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据