4.4 Article

Neural organization of ventral white matter tracts parallels the initial steps of reading development: A DTI tractography study

期刊

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 32-40

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.05.007

关键词

DTI; Reading; Ventral white matter; IFOF; ILF; Uncinate fasciculus

资金

  1. Research Council of KU Leuven [OT/12/044]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders [G0920.12]
  3. Welcome Trust [103759/Z/14/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [103759/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insight in the developmental trajectory of the neuroanatomical reading correlates is important to understand related cognitive processes and disorders. In adults, a dual pathway model has been suggested encompassing a dorsal phonological and a ventral orthographic white matter system. This dichotomy seems not present in prereaders, and the specific role of ventral white matter in reading remains unclear. Therefore, the present longitudinal study investigated the relation between ventral white matter and cognitive processes underlying reading in children with a broad range of reading skills (n = 61). Ventral pathways of the reading network were manually traced using diffusion tractography: the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and uncinate fasciculus (UF). Pathways were examined pre-reading (5-6 years) and after two years of reading acquisition (7-8 years). Dimension reduction for the cognitive measures resulted in one component for pre-reading cognitive measures and a separate phonological and orthographic component for the early reading measures. Regression analyses revealed a relation between the pre-reading cognitive component and bilateral IFOF and left ILF. Interestingly, exclusively the left IFOF was related to the orthographic component, whereas none of the pathways was related to the phonological component. Hence, the left IFOF seems to serve as the lexical reading route, already in the earliest reading stages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据