4.7 Article

Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 214-222

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.010

关键词

Social media; Self-efficacy; Internet cognitive failure; Self-directed learning; Learning interest

资金

  1. Aim for the Top University Project of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) - Ministry of Education, Taiwan
  2. International Research-Intensive Center of Excellence Program of NTNU
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 103-2911-I-4003-301, MOST 101-2511-S-003-056-MY3, MOST 104-2911-I-003-301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social media has been postulated as a convenient online resource tool for learning. To understand the usefulness of social media, the present study focused on Guitar Class of Uncle Ma, one of YouTube's most popular guitar learning channels in Taiwan, as a self-directed learning tool. Drawing upon a cognitive-affective theory of learning with media (CATLM), learners have the ability to control the pace of learning through YouTube by repeating playback, rewinding or fast forwarding the video. This study used expectation confirmation theory and structural equation modeling to explore the relationship between affective and cognitive factors in learning with social media. Using convenience sampling, data from 117 users were collected and the results showed Internet cognitive failure (ICF) was negatively correlated to self-efficacy and learning interest in using Guitar Class of Uncle Ma for learning guitar skills. However, self-efficacy and learning interest was positively correlated to learning satisfaction. The results suggest that Guitar Class of Uncle Ma is a beneficial self-directed learning tool for learners with low levels of Internet cognitive failure and high levels of self-efficacy and learning interest when learning how to play guitar using YouTube. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据