3.9 Article

Smart DNA Fabrication Using Sound Waves: Applying Acoustic Dispensing Technologies to Synthetic Biology

期刊

JALA
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 49-56

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2211068215593754

关键词

synthetic biology; DNA assembly; acoustic dispensing

资金

  1. University of Edinburgh
  2. SULSA
  3. BBSRC [BB/M005690/1, BB/M025640/1]
  4. EPSRC CASE studentship [EP/M506515/1]
  5. Thermo Fisher
  6. Research Councils UK Open Access Fund
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M00029X/1, BB/M005690/1, BB/M018040/1, BB/M025640/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K001744/1, G0900740] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010003] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. BBSRC [BB/M00029X/1, BB/M005690/1, BB/M025640/1, BB/M018040/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. MRC [G0900740, MR/K001744/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. NERC [NBAF010003] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic droplet ejection (ADE) technology uses focused acoustic energy to transfer nanoliter-scale liquid droplets with high precision and accuracy. This noncontact, tipless, low-volume dispensing technology minimizes the possibility of cross-contamination and potentially reduces the costs of reagents and consumables. To date, acoustic dispensers have mainly been used in screening libraries of compounds. In this paper, we describe the first application of this powerful technology to the rapidly developing field of synthetic biology, for DNA synthesis and assembly at the nanoliter scale using a Labcyte Echo 550 acoustic dispenser. We were able to successfully downscale PCRs and the popular one-pot DNA assembly methods, Golden Gate and Gibson assemblies, from the microliter to the nanoliter scale with high assembly efficiency, which effectively cut the reagent cost by 20- to 100-fold. We envision that acoustic dispensing will become an instrumental technology in synthetic biology, in particular in the era of DNA foundries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据