4.7 Article

Excessive use of Twitter among college students in the UK: Validation of the Microblog Excessive Use Scale and relationship to social interaction and loneliness

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 963-971

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.020

关键词

Addiction; Twitter; Microblogging; Loneliness; Social networking

资金

  1. Anhui University [023032030063]
  2. Social Science Planned Project of Anhui Province [AHSKQ2014D30]
  3. Open Key Laboratory Project of Brain function and Brain Diseases in Chinese Academy of Sciences [2014-5]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471071, 31171083, 31500917, 31230032]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [WK2070000033]
  6. Hefei Science Center, CAS User with Potential [2015HSC-UP017]
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJ2070000018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microblogging on sites like Twitter is a growing and popular trend among young people. Apparently, some users of these microblogs exhibit addiction-like symptoms. Until recently, there was no psychometric scale to measure the excessive use of Twitter. The development of the Microblog Excessive Use Scale (MEUS) in 2014 proved a positive step in assessing this phenomenon. In the current study, we employed the MEUS to assess excessive use of Twitter in a sample of 256 college students (53.1% female; mean age 21.4 years) in the UK. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), calculation of criterion-related and concurrent validity and reliability were performed to assess the scale's psychometric properties. The MEUS was found to be a valid instrument for assessing excessive use of Twitter among UK college students. In addition, we found that real life social interaction was negatively associated with excessive use of Twitter and this relationship was mediated by loneliness. We compared our results with results from a previous study in which the MEUS was developed and noted some interesting differences, which might be explained by cultural differences between samples in the two studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All Tights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据