4.7 Article

Migration, land use and forest change in St. Lucia, West Indies

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 290-300

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.025

关键词

Migration; Return migration; Agriculture; Reforestation; Forest transition

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Mount Allison University
  3. Government of St. Lucia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migration is a central feature of Caribbean societies, yet its consequences for land use and forest change have been little studied. This paper reviews the general history of human migration in the West Indies and its relationship to land use. It examines the case of post-war St. Lucia, in particular, focusing on the relationship between migration, land use change and forests in two watersheds. Out-migration to the UK and North America from 1950s-1970s contributed to reduced farming and increased upland afforestation. In the 1990s and early 2000s, a huge wave of farmland abandonment and ensuing afforestation swept across the island, triggered by WTO rulings that sharply eroded existing export markets for bananas, the country's dominant crop. These effects were compounded by growing shortages of agricultural labor as men and women departed the countryside to work in the fast-growing, domestic construction, tourism and related service sectors. Since the late 1980s, a kind of 'boomerang urbanization' has occurred in which the return of earlier cohorts of out-migrants (who had departed rural areas to overseas urban centers in the 1950s, 60s and 70s) has fueled a residential home construction boom back home that is transforming extensive lowland agricultural lands and natural forests near the coast to peri-urban suburbs, while contributing to upland afforestation by drawing labor out of farming. This dramatic shift of environmental impacts away from the uplands to the lowlands and coasts appears widespread within the island Caribbean, but policy makers have been slow to acknowledge and respond to it. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据