4.3 Article

Early introduction and cumulative consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages during the pre-school period and risk of obesity at 8-14 years of age

期刊

PEDIATRIC OBESITY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 68-74

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12023

关键词

Children; obesity; pre-school; sugar-sweetened beverages

资金

  1. US NIEHS [P01-ES022844, R01-ES021446, R01-ES005947]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [41912-M]
  3. NIEHS/US EPA Formative Children's Center for Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research [NIH P20-ES018171/EPA, 834800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) has been associated with risk of obesity, but little evidence exists to evaluate if age of introduction and cumulative SSB consumption increases risk in children. Objectives: The objective of the study was to estimate the relationship between age of introduction and cumulative SSB consumption with risk of obesity in 227 Mexican children. Methods: SSB intake was measured every 6 months; age of introduction and cumulative consumption during the pre-school period were calculated. Height, weight, waist circumference, SSB intake and other relevant variables were measured at age 8-14 years and obesity defined using standard criteria. Results: All participants were introduced to SSB before age 24 months and most (73%) before 12 months. Early SSB introduction (<= 12 months) was not significantly associated with increased odds of obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 4.59). However, children in the highest tertile of cumulative SSB consumption, compared with the lowest, had almost three times the odds of general (OR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.27, 7.00) and abdominal (OR = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.03, 7.03) obesity at age 8-14 years. Conclusions: High SSB consumption increased the likelihood of obesity in 8-14-year-old children. Our results suggest that SSB intake should be delayed and excessive SSB consumption in pre-school period should be avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据