4.5 Article

Exploring the complex response to linuron of bacterial communities from biopurification systems by means of cultivation-independent methods

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv157

关键词

linuron; degradation; pesticide; IncP-1

资金

  1. EU [MetaExplore 222625]
  2. Inter-University Attraction Pole (IUAP) 'mu-manager' of the Belgian Science Policy (BELSPO) [P7/25]
  3. CAPES-PNPD (Brazilian Ministry of Education)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On-farm biopurification systems (BPSs) treat pesticide-contaminated wastewater at farms through biodegradation and sorption processes. However, information on the microbiota involved in pesticide removal in BPSs is scarce. Here we report on the response of BPS bacterial communities to the herbicide linuron (BPS+) compared with the control (BPS-) in a microcosm experiment. Both denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from community DNA indicated shifts in the bacterial community after linuron application. Responding populations belonged to taxa that were previously reported from linuron degrading consortia cultivated from soil (Hyphomicrobiaceae, Comamonadaceae, Micrococcaceae). In addition, numerous taxa with increased relative abundance were identified that were previously not associated with linuron degradation. The relative abundance of IncP-1 korB copies increased in response to linuron application. Amplicon pyrosequencing of IncP-1 trfA genes revealed a high IncP-1 plasmid diversity and suggested that populations carrying IncP-1 beta plasmids increased in relative abundance. Transferable mercury resistance plasmids were exogenously captured from BPS+/BPS-, and in three transconjugants from BPS+ the gene hylA was detected. Our data suggest the existence of a multispecies linuron degrading bacterial food web and an involvement of IncP-1 plasmids in the adaptation of bacterial communities to pesticide pollution in BPSs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据