4.7 Article

Genomic insights into Staphylococcus equorum KS1039 as a potential starter culture for the fermentation of high-salt foods

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4532-1

关键词

Staphylococcus equorum; Fermentation; Jeotgal; Starter; Bacteriocin; CRISPR/Cas system

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1D1A1B01011421, NRF-2016R1D1A1B03930239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Our previous comparative genomic analysis of Staphylococcus equorum KS1039 with five S. equorum strains illuminated the genomic basis of its safety and salt tolerance. However, a comprehensive picture of the cellular components and metabolic pathways involved in the degradation of macromolecules and development of sensory properties has not been obtained for S. equorum. Therefore, in this study, we examined the general metabolism of S. equorum based on information obtained from published complete genome sequences of six S. equorum strains isolated from different niches. Additionally, the utility of strain KS1039 as a starter culture for high-salt food fermentations was examined. Results: All six S. equorum strains contained genes involved in glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and amino acid metabolic pathways, as well as color development. Moreover, the strains had the potential to produce acetoin, butanediol, and branched chain fatty acids, all of which are important flavor compounds. None of the strains contained decarboxylase genes, which are required for histamine and tyramine production. Strain KS1039 contained bacteriocin and CRISPR/Cas gene clusters, and experimental results suggested that these genes were functional in vitro. Conclusions: The comparative genomic analysis carried out herein provides important information on the usefulness of S. equorum KS1039 as a starter culture for the fermentation of high-salt foods in terms of safety, salt tolerance, bacteriocin production, and foreign plasmid restriction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据