4.7 Article

Transcriptomic profiling of tall fescue in response to heat stress and improved thermotolerance by melatonin and 24-epibrassinolide

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4588-y

关键词

24-epibrassinolide; Antioxidant; Gene expression; Heat stress; Melatonin; Tall fescue; Transcriptomic analysis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFD0201305]
  2. Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-Innovation Foundation [2016RC010]
  3. Chutian Scholars Fund Project
  4. CAS-TWAS President's Fellowship for International PhD Students
  5. Sino-Africa Joint Research Project Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Tall fescue is a widely used cool season turfgrass and relatively sensitive to high temperature. Chemical compounds like melatonin (MT) and 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) have been reported to improve plant heat stress tolerance effectively. Results: In this study, we reported that MT and EBL pretreated tall fescue seedlings showed decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS), electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehide (MDA), but increased chlorophyll (Chl), total protein and antioxidant enzyme activities under heat stress condition, resulting in improved plant growth. Transcriptomic profiling analysis showed that 4311 and 8395 unigenes were significantly changed after 2 h and 12 h of heat treatments, respectively. Among them, genes involved in heat stress responses, DNA, RNA and protein degradation, redox, energy metabolisms, and hormone metabolism pathways were highly induced after heat stress. Genes including FaHSFA3, FaAWPM and FaCYTC2 were significantly upregulated by both MT and EBL treatments, indicating that these genes might function as the putative target genes of MT and EBL. Conclusions: These findings indicated that heat stress caused extensively transcriptomic reprogramming of tall fescue and exogenous application of MT and EBL effectively improved thermotolerance in tall fescue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据