4.6 Review

Metformin, Asian ethnicity and risk of prostate cancer in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3934-9

关键词

Metformin; Ethnicity & prostate cancer

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research
  2. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of the University of Alberta
  3. Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences of the University of Alberta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Metformin is associated with a reduced risk of some cancers but its effect on prostate cancer is unclear. Some studies suggest only Asians derive this benefit. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review with particular attention to ethnicity. Methods: Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBM Reviews were searched from inception to 2015. Two reviewers identified and abstracted articles. Studies were pooled using random effects model and stratified by Westernvs Asian-based populations. Results: We identified 482 studies; 26 underwent full review. Of Western-based studies (n = 23), two were randomized trials and 21 were observational studies. All Asian-based studies (n = 3) were observational. There were 1,572,307 patients, 1,171,643 Western vs 400,664 Asian. Across all studies there was no association between metformin and prostate cancer (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.18, I-2: 97%), with similar findings in Western-based trials (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.72-2.64 I-2: 15%) and observational studies (RR: 1.03 95% CI: 0.94-1.13, I-2: 88%). Asian-based studies suggested a non-significant reduction (RR: 0. 75, 95% CI: 0.42-1.34, I-2: 90%), although these results were highly influenced by one study of almost 400,000 patients (propensity-adjusted RR: 0.47 95% CI 0.45-0.49). Removing this influential study yielded an estimate more congruent with Western-based studies (RR: 0.98 95% CI: 0.71-1.36, I-2: 0%). Conclusion: There is likely no association between metformin and risk of prostate cancer, in either Western-based or Asian-based populations after removing a highly influential Asian-based study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据