4.7 Article

Finite volume corrections to the electromagnetic mass of composite particles

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034012

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY15-15738]
  2. City College of New York-RIKEN/Brookhaven Research Center fellowship
  3. Professional Staff Congress of The CUNY
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Physics [1515738] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long-range electromagnetic interaction presents a challenge for numerical computations in QCD + QED. In addition to power-law finite volume effects, the standard lattice gauge theory approach introduces nonlocality through removal of photon zero-momentum modes. The resulting finite volume effects must be quantitatively understood; and, to this end, nonrelativistic effective field theories are an efficient tool, especially in the case of composite particles. Recently an oddity related to nonlocality of the standard lattice approach was uncovered by the Budapest-Marseille-Wuppertal collaboration. Explicit contributions from antiparticles appear to be required so that finite volume QED results for a pointlike fermion can be reproduced in the effective field theory description. We provide transparency for this argument by considering pointlike scalars and spinors in finite volume QED using the method of regions. For the more germane case of composite particles, we determine that antiparticle modes contribute to the finite volume electromagnetic mass of composite spinors through terms proportional to the squares of timelike form factors evaluated at threshold. We extend existing finite volume calculations to one order higher, which is particularly relevant for the electromagnetic mass of light nuclei. Additionally, we verify that the analogous finite volume contributions to the nucleon mass in chiral perturbation theory vanish in accordance with locality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据