4.7 Article

Platelets play an essential role in murine lung development through Clec-2/podoplanin interaction

期刊

BLOOD
卷 132, 期 11, 页码 1167-1179

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-12-823369

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI [16K19572]
  2. Funding Program for Next Generation World-leading Researchers [LS052]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K19572] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platelets participate in not only thrombosis and hemostasis but also other pathophysiological processes, including tumor metastasis and inflammation. However, the putative role of platelets in the development of solid organs has not yet been described. Here, we report that platelets regulate lung development through the interaction between the plateletactivation receptor, C-type lectin-like receptor-2 (Clec-2; encoded by Clec1b), and its ligand, podoplanin, a membrane protein. Clec-2 deletion in mouse platelets led to lung malformation, which caused respiratory failure and neonatal lethality. In these embryos, a-smooth muscle actin-positive alveolar duct myofibroblasts (adMYFs) were almost absent in the primary alveolar septa, which resulted in loss of alveolar elastic fibers and lung malformation. Our data suggest that the lack of adMYFs is caused by abnormal differentiation of lung mesothelial cells (luMCs), the major progenitor of adMYFs. In the developing lung, podoplanin expression is detected in alveolar epithelial cells (AECs), luMCs, and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). LEC-specific podoplanin knockout mice showed neonatal lethality and Clec1b2/2-like lung developmental abnormalities. Notably, these Clec1b2/2-like lung abnormalities were also observed after thrombocytopenia or transforming growth factor-b depletion in fetuses. We propose that the interaction between Clec-2 on platelets and podoplanin on LECs stimulates adMYF differentiation of luMCs through transforming growth factor-b signaling, thus regulating normal lung development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据