4.5 Article

Investigating the Influence of Mercerization Treatment of Sisal Fiber on the Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Polypropylene Composites and Modeling of the Properties

期刊

FIBERS AND POLYMERS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 650-656

出版社

KOREAN FIBER SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-015-0650-4

关键词

Composites; Sisal fiber; Mercerization treatment; Mechanical properties; Modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work was centered on investigating the influence of mercerization treatment of sisal fiber on the mechanical properties of reinforced polypropylene (PP) composites and modeling of the mechanical properties. The sisal fiber was sourced from their plantation and was extracted by soil retting process. The extracted fibers were divided into three from where two parts were subjected to mercerization treatment with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and potassium hydroxide (KOH) in a shaker water bath at 50 degrees C for 4 hours respectively. The third part was left as untreated fibers. Both the treated and untreated fibers were cut into 10 mm lengths and were used for the production of the composites. The fibers and the polypropylene were blended in predetermined proportions in a randomly dispersed mode and were subjected to heat and pressure in a heating compression molding machine maintained at 170 degrees C for 10 minutes. Tensile and flexural properties were observed from universal testing machine and a mathematical response surface methodology model (RSM) was developed. From the flexural and tensile results, it was observed that, KOH treated sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites gave the best flexural and tensile properties when compared to NaOH treated sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites and untreated sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. The developed RSM models reveal high degree of correlation between the experimental values and the predicted values. This implies that, the model can be used to predict the mechanical properties of the sisal fiber reinforced polypropylene composite materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据