4.7 Article

Wildfire ignition in the forests of southeast China: Identifying drivers and spatial distribution to predict wildfire likelihood

期刊

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 12-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.014

关键词

Human-caused fire; Fire occurrence; Spatial distribution; Drivers of forest fire; Logistic regression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31400552]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2015J05049]
  3. Special funding for Universities by Fujian Education department [JK2014012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the spatial distribution and driving factors of forest fire facilitates local forest fire management planning and optimization of resource allocation for fire prevention geographically. In this study, we analyzed the spatial pattern and drivers of forest fire in Fujian province, southeastern China, during 2000-2008 using Ripley's K-function and logistic regression (LR) model. The likelihood of fire occurrence was mapped based on the resultant model. The data regarding fire ignitions, weather conditions, vegetation, topography, infrastructure, and socioeconomic factors were extracted from ArcGIS environment. The study revealed that fire ignition was mainly clustered in space due to the comprehensive influence of different factors. Elevation, daily precipitation, and daily relative humidity were negatively associated with fire ignitions, whereas distance to settlement, population density, and per capita gross domestic product (GDP) impacted fire occurrence positively. The spatial distribution of fire occurrence likelihood was highly variable in Fujian: high fire likelihood was prevalent in the northern and southeastern parts of Fujian, whereas it was relatively low in the western province. Fire risk may be underestimated in some areas of Fujian according to the spatial patterns of the model residual, which should be paid more attention to in the forest fire management practice. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据