4.8 Article

Applying strand displacement amplification to quantum dots-based fluorescent lateral flow assay strips for HIV-DNA detection

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 211-217

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.039

关键词

Fluorescent LFA strip; CdTe QD; Hairpin DNA; Strand displacement amplification; HIV-DNA detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475032, 21405035, 21175032]
  2. Natural Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Hubei Province of China [2014CFA015]
  3. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics [Z2015021]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2017CFB529]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Up to now, the colloidal gold labeling immunochromatographic test strip is a mature and applicable technology. However, different from the conventional gold nanoparticle, quantum dot (QD) possesses larger specific surface area and better biocompatibility. So, as a novel nanomaterial, QD is capable of assembling more biomolecule which could enhance the sensitivity and accuracy of strips by rationality. Besides, strand displacement amplification was drawn into our test strips in this paper, this assumption made HIV-DNA recycling many times and converting it to plentiful QD-dsDNA (double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid), where after these nano-structures would be captured by test zone. Meanwhile, the suggested scheme eliminated the hook effect owing to the target drop out of the incorporation on test zone, and any nucleotide sequence or substance which has aptamers can work as the target, such as carcinoembryonic antigen or mycotoxin. This assay realized the detection limit of as low as 0.76 pM (S/N = 3) and the detection range of 1 pM to 10 nM. In the end, we made use of this fluorescent lateral flow assay strips with great reproducibility for detecting HIV-DNA in human serum, that attested this method could be applied to practical application prospectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据