4.8 Article

ironPhone: Mobile device-coupled point-of-care diagnostics for assessment of iron status by quantification of serum ferritin

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 115-121

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.038

关键词

Iron deficiency; Lateral flow immunoassay; Ferritin; Point-of-care; Diagnostics

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIP-1430092]
  2. Nutrition International [10-8007-CORNE-01]
  3. Thrasher Research Fund Early Career Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron deficiency (ID) is an urgent public health problem that has devastating effects on maternal and child health. However, due to poor access and affordability, screening and diagnosis for ID is often limited to proxy hemoglobin measurements alone. Here, we report the development and validation of ironPhone, a mobile device coupled portable diagnostics for quantification of serum ferritin concentrations, an iron status biomarker, within a few minutes, from a drop of fingerprick blood. The ironPhone diagnostic platform comprises of a smartphone accessory, an app, and a disposable lateral flow immunoassay test strip to quantify serum ferritin. For initial validation in the lab, we optimized and evaluated the performance of ironPhone with known ferritin concentrations in spiked buffer and serum samples. Following lab validation, we performed a human validation by collecting fingerprick whole blood samples from 20 participants to assess iron status using ironPhone and compared the results with the laboratory standard IMMULITE 2000 analyzer. Findings from the ironPhone for the buffer and spiked serum samples provided a calibration curve with R-2 values of 0.97 (n=27) and 0.93 (n=12), respectively. On comparison with the laboratory standard IMMULITE analyzer in whole blood samples, a correlation of 0.92 (P < 0.0001) was observed with a sensitivity of over 90% for predicting ID (ferritin < 15.0 mu g/L) via the ironPhone, demonstrating its promise for iron status assessment at the point-of-care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据