4.8 Article

One-step selective screening of bioactive molecules in living cells using sulfur-doped microporous carbon

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 237-245

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.03.026

关键词

Extracellular DA; Biological samples; Biosensor; Mono-bioactive molecules; Living cells; Biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A metal-free electrode using heteroatom-doped microporous carbon was fabricated for the ultrasensitive monitoring of mono-bioactive molecules and the selective signaling of dopamine (DA) secreted by living cells. The constructed electrode based on sulfur-doped microporous carbon (S-MC) shows a high surface area, a spherical construction, numerous carbon chain defects, and microporous structures, which are the key factors of the interactive signaling transducer, fast response, and active interfacial surfaces. The intrinsic features of S-MC with different %S-doping (S-MC-1, and S-MC-2) through the sp(2)-carbon chain create abundant catalytic active sites, facilitate molecular diffusion through the microporous structure, promote strong binding with the targeted molecules, and induce interactions at electrolyte-electrode interfaces. The S-MC-1 provides selective signaling in a tertiary mixture of DA, ascorbic acid (AA), and uric acid (UA) with a high sensitivity and a wide linear range of 0.01-5, 10-4000, and 1-2000 mu M, respectively. The detection limits were set at 3 nM, 1.26 mu M, and 0.23 mu M for DA, AA, and UA respectively. The S-MC-1 demonstrated a selective screening of DA released from PC12 cells under a K+ ion-stimulator with high sensitivity and promoted high biocompatibility, low cytotoxicity, high stability, and reliable reproducibility (%RSD ranged from 1 to 2.7). Our findings indicated that the S-MC-1 can be utilized as an in-vitro model for simultaneously monitoring extracellular-DA secreted from living cells and sensing mono-bioactive molecules in biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据