4.8 Article

Microbial dynamics of biofilm and suspended flocs in anammox membrane bioreactor: The effect of non-woven fabric membrane

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 259-266

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.070

关键词

Anammox; Non-woven fabric; Substrate removal model; Microbial community dynamics; High-throughput sequence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477063, 21777086]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFF0206702]
  3. Taishan Scholar Program [ts201511003]
  4. Key R & D project of Shandong Province [2016GSF117032]
  5. Young Scholars Program of Shandong University [2016WLJH16]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2016JC031]
  7. Jinan Science and Technology Project [201401364]
  8. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Funds [JCYJ20170307092918052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane bioreactor with non-woven fabric membranes (NWMBR) is developing into a suitable method for anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox). As a carrier, non-woven fabric membrane divided total biomass into biofilm and suspended flocs gradually. Total nitrogen removal efficiency was maintained around 82.6% under nitrogen loading rate of 567.4 mg N/L/d after 260 days operation. Second-order substrate removal and Stover-Kincannon models were successfully used to simulate the nitrogen removal performance in NWMBR. High-throughput sequence was employed to elucidate the underlying microbial community dynamics. Candidatus Brocadia, Kuenenia, Jettenia were detected to affirm the dominant status of anammox microorganisms and 98.2% of anammox microorganisms distributed in biofilm. In addition, abundances of functional genes (hzs, nirK) in biofilm and suspended flocs were assessed by quantitative PCR to further investigate the coexistence of anammox and other microorganisms. Potential nitrogen removal pathways were established according to relevant nitrogen removal performance and microbial community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据