4.5 Article

Effects of Peptide Charge, Orientation, and Concentration on Melittin Transmembrane Pores

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 114, 期 12, 页码 2865-2874

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.05.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM117146]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB 1244207]
  3. NIH [R01GM116961, P41GM103712-S1, 8G12MD007603]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1244207] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melittin is a short cationic peptide that exerts cytolytic effects on bacterial and eukaryotic cells. Experiments suggest that in zwitterionic membranes, melittin forms transmembrane toroidal pores supported by four to eight peptides. A recently constructed melittin variant with a reduced cationic charge, MelP5, is active at 10-fold lower concentrations. In previous work, we performed molecular dynamics simulations on the microsecond timescale to examine the supramolecular pore structure of a melittin tetramer in zwitterionic and partially anionic membranes. We now extend that study to include the effects of peptide charge, initial orientation, and number of monomers on the pore formation and stabilization processes. Our results show that parallel transmembrane orientations of melittin and MelP5 are more consistent with experimental data. Whereas a MelP5 parallel hexamer forms a large stable pore during the 5-mu s simulation time, a melittin hexamer and an octamer are not fully stable, with several monomers dissociating during the simulation time. Interaction-energy analysis shows that this difference in behavior between melittin and MelP5 is not due to stronger electrostatic repulsion between neighboring melittin peptides but to peptide-lipid interactions that disfavor the isolated MelP5 transmembrane monomer. The ability of melittin monomers to diffuse freely in the 1,2-dimyristoyl-SN-glycero-3-phosphocholine membrane leads to dynamic pores with varying molecularity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据