4.5 Article

Traction Force Screening Enabled by Compliant PDMS Elastomers

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 114, 期 9, 页码 2194-2199

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.045

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN/05843-2014, EQPEQ/472339-2015]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [143327]
  3. Canadian Cancer Society [703930]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R21HL123522, DP2-OD006649]
  5. Fonds de recherche Sante Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Actomyosin contractility is an essential element of many aspects of cellular biology and manifests as traction forces that cells exert on their surroundings. The central role of these forces makes them a novel principal therapeutic target in diverse diseases. This requires accurate and higher-capacity measurements of traction forces; however, existing methods are largely low throughput, limiting their utility in broader applications. To address this need, we employ Fourier-transform traction force microscopy in a parallelized 96-well format, which we refer to as contractile force screening. Critically, rather than the frequently employed hydrogel polyacrylamide, we fabricate these plates using polydimethylsiloxane rubber. Key to this approach is that the polydimethylsiloxane used is very compliant, with a lower-bound Young's modulus of similar to 0.4 kPa. We subdivide these monolithic substrates spatially into biochemically independent wells, creating a uniform multiwell platform for traction force screening. We demonstrate the utility and versatility of this platform by quantifying the compound and dose-dependent contractility responses of human airway smooth muscle cells and retinal pigment epithelial cells. By directly quantifying the endpoint of therapeutic intent, airway-smooth-muscle contractile force, this approach fills an important methodological void in current screening approaches for bronchodilator drug discovery, and, more generally, in measuring contractile response for a broad range of cell types and pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据