4.7 Article

Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 104, 期 3, 页码 534-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.022

关键词

Energy; human embryo; implantation; mitochondrial DNA; prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the clinical relevance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content as a viability score in human euploid embryos. Design: Retrospective analysis of mtDNA content of transferred euploid embryos. Setting: Reproductive genetics laboratory. Patient(s): Single-embryo transfer in 270 patients who underwent preimplantation genetic screening (205 day-3 blastomere biopsies, and 65 day-5 trophectoderm biopsies), and 10 patients with double-embryo transfer (male-female). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Normalized mtDNA content versus nuclear DNA (nDNA) from transferred euploid embryos. Result(s): A high mtDNA copy number in euploid embryos is indicative of lower embryo viability and implantation. Using the normalized mtDNA content, we created the mitochondrial score or Mitoscore (Ms). Day-3 embryos with <34 (MsA) had an implantation rate (IR) of 59% (n = 51); those with 34-52 (MsB) had an IR of 44% (n = 52); those with 52-97 (MsC) had an IR of 42% (n = 50); and those with >97 (MsD) had an IR of 25% (n = 52). Embryos with Ms >160 (n = 22) never implanted. Day-5 embryos with <18.19 (MsA) had an IR of 81%; those with 18.19-24.15 (MsB) had an IR of 50% (n = 16); those with 24.15-50.58 (MsC) had an IR of 62% (n = 16); and those with levels >50.58 (MsD) had an IR of 18% (n = 17). Embryos with levels >60 (n = 7) never implanted. Conclusion(s): An increased amount of mtDNA in euploid embryos is related to poor implantation potential and may be indicative of reduced metabolic fuel during oocyte maturation. We are implementing Ms in our preimplantation genetic screening platform to prospectively analyze its clinical relevance. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据