4.7 Article

Shallow whole genome sequencing is well suited for the detection of chromosomal aberrations in human blastocysts

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 1276-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1144

关键词

Massive parallel sequencing; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; whole genome amplification; blastocyst biopsy; chromosomal rearrangements

资金

  1. BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) Ghent University [BOF15/GOA/011]
  2. Hercules stichting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To add evidence that massive parallel sequencing (MPS) is a valuable substitute for array comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) with a resolution that is more appropriate for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in translocation carriers. Design: Study of diagnostic accuracy. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Fifteen patients with a balanced structural rearrangement were included in the study: eight reciprocal translocations, four Robertsonian translocations, two inversions, and one insertional translocation. Intervention(s): Trophectoderm biopsy was performed on 47 blastocysts. Main Outcome Measure(s): In the current study, shallow whole genome MPS on a NextSeq500 (Illumina) and Ion Proton (Life Technologies) instrument was performed in parallel on 47 whole genome amplified trophectoderm samples. Data analyses were performed using the QDNAseq algorithm implemented in Vivar. Result(s): In total, 5 normal and 42 abnormal embryos were analyzed. All aberrations previously detected with arrayCGH could be readily detected in the MPS data using both technologies and were correctly identified. The smallest detected abnormality was a similar to 4.5 Mb deletion/duplication. Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates that shallow whole genome sequencing can be applied efficiently for the detection of numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations in embryos, equaling or even exceeding the resolution of the routinely used microarrays. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据