4.4 Article

Protective effect of quercetin and rutin encapsulated liposomes on induced oxidative stress

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 55-63

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2017.11.003

关键词

Liposome; Quercetin; Rutin; Oxidative stress; Cell viability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural antioxidants show many pharmacological properties, but poor solubility and inability to cross cell membrane. Liposomes are biocompatible and phospholipid vesicles able to carry hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and amphiphilic molecules. This paper focus on the synthesis of anionic, cationic and zwitterionic liposomes, loaded with quercetin or rutin, and on the evaluation of their cytotoxicity and protective effects against oxidative stress. Chemical characterization was obtained by dynamic light scattering and z-potential experiments. In vitro cell behavior was evaluated by Neutral Red Uptake test. All liposomes, empty and loaded with antioxidants, are stable. The cytotoxicity of both quercetin and rutin encapsulated in zwitterionic and anionic liposomes is higher than that of their solutions. Quercetin and rutin loaded in cationic liposomes are able to inhibit the toxic effect of empty liposomes. The encapsulation of rutin at 5.0 x 10(-5) and 5.0 x 10(-4) M, in zwitterionic and anionic liposomes, protects fibroblasts by H2O2 treatment, while the loading with quercetin does not have effect on improving cell viability. All data suggest that the tested liposomes are stable and able to include quercetin and rutin. The liposomes encapsulation of antioxidants makes easier their internalization by cells. Moreover, zwitterionic and anionic liposomes loaded with rutin protect cells by oxidative stress. Liposomes stability together with their good in vitro cytocompatibility, both empty and loaded with antioxidant molecules, makes these systems suitable candidates as drug delivery systems. Moreover, the encapsulation of rutin, is able to protect cells by oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据