4.7 Article

Effects of adamantane alterations on soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition potency, physical properties and metabolic stability

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 510-527

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.12.024

关键词

Soluble epoxide hydrolase; Inhibitor; Adamantane; Isocyanate; Urea

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [16-43-340116r_a]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [4.7491.2017/BCh]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [R01 ES002710]
  4. NIEHS Superfund Research Program [P42 ES004699]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P42ES004699, R01ES002710] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adamantyl groups are widely used in medicinal chemistry. However, metabolism limits their usage. Herein, we report the first systematic study of adamantyl ureas and diureas bearing substituents in bridgehead positions of adamantane and/ or spacers between urea groups and adamantane group, and tested their effects on soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor potency and metabolic stability. Interestingly, the effect on activity against human and murine sEH varied in opposite ways with each new methyl group introduced into the molecule. Compounds with three methyl substituents in adamantane were very poor inhibitors of murine sEH while still very potent against human sEH. In addition, diureas with terminal groups bigger than sEH catalytic tunnel diameter were still good inhibitors suggesting that the active site of sEH opens to capture the substrate or inhibitor molecule. The introduction of one methyl group leads to 4-fold increase in potency without noticeable loss of metabolic stability compared to the unsubstituted adamantane. However, introduction of two or three methyl groups leads to 8-fold and 98-fold decrease in stability in human liver microsomes for the corresponding compounds. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据