4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and anticancer studies of novel aminobenzazolyl pyrimidines as tyrosine kinase inhibitors

期刊

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 84-100

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.01.008

关键词

Aminobenzothiazole; Molecular docking; NCI; Pharmacophore; Pharmacokinetics; Pyrimidine; Tyrosine kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal signalling from the Protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) like receptor tyrosine kinases and intracellular tyrosine kinases can lead to diseases such as cancer especially non-small cell lung cancer, chronic myeloid leukaemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Various Protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available but face poor bioavailability, severe toxicities and recent cases of drug-resistant cancers prompts for development of better drug molecules. In this study we report the design and development of a novel Protein Tyrosine Kinase (PTK) inhibitor on the basis of pharmacophore modelling. Compound 2-(benzo[d]oxazol-2-ylamino)-N-(2-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4-methyl-6-(3-nitrophenyl) pyrimidine-5-carboxamide 31 was obtained containing essential pharmacophore structural features. This compound exhibited highest activity against leukaemia cell line (RPMI-8226) at 0.7244 mu M, renal cancer cell line (A498) at 0.8511 mu M and prostate cancer cell line (PC-3) at 0.7932 mu M on the NCI five dose assay test. The PTK assay provides promising activity at IC50 of 0.07 mu M in the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-468. Compound 31 had good intermolecular interaction with PTK in the molecular docking studies, this ligand-enzyme complex was found to stable in the MM-PBSA study over 100 ns. It had 54.22% oral bioavailability with T-max of 0.60 h which is higher compared to the dasatinib with bioavailability and T-max of 14-34% and 1-1.42 h respectively. Anticancer action of 31 was found to be impressive in pharmacokinetic studies making it a potential lead molecule. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据