4.6 Article

Keys to successful blue carbon projects: Lessons learned from global case studies

期刊

MARINE POLICY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 76-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.020

关键词

Seagrass, salt marsh and mangroves; Soil carbon; Carbon sequestration and storage; UNFCCC; Voluntary carbon market

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - CICS) at the University of Maryland/ESSIC [NA14NES4320003]
  2. Ernest F. Hollings Scholarship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem services such as protection from storms and erosion, tourism benefits, and climate adaptation and mitigation have been increasingly recognized as important considerations for environmental policymalcing. Recent research has shown that coastal ecosystems such as seagrasses, salt marshes, and mangroves provide climate mitigation services because they are particularly effective at sequestering and storing carbon dioxide, referred to as coastal blue carbon. Unfortunately, degradation of blue carbon ecosystems due to anthropogenic impacts contributes to anthropogenic carbon emissions from land use impacts and prevents these ecosystems from continuing to sequester and store carbon. Given the impressive carbon sequestration and storage in coastal ecosystems, many countries with blue carbon resources are beginning to implement blue carbon restoration projects using carbon financing mechanisms. This study analyzed four case studies of projects in Kenya, India, Vietnam, and Madagascar, evaluating the individual carbon financing mechanisms, the project outcomes, and the policy implications of each. Strengths and challenges of implementing blue carbon projects are discussed and considerations that all projects should address are examined in order to develop long-term sustainable climate mitigation or adaptation policies. This analysis can help to inform future project design considerations as well as policy opportunities. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据