4.7 Article

Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes atherosclerosis via CD36-dependent MAPK/JNK pathway

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 941-947

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.016

关键词

TMAO; Atherosclerosis; Macrophage; Foam cell; CD36

资金

  1. Jiangsu Province Qing Nian Ren Cai [QNRC2016432]
  2. Huai'an Science Support Project [HASZ2013030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Many studies have identified trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) as a new risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. It has been suggested that TMAO promotes atherosclerosis development. However, the underlying mechanism is still unclear. Methods: Apoe-/- mice were fed a high-fat diet and given water with or without TMAO for 8-week. Histological and immunohistological analyses were used to evaluate the atherogenic effect of TMAO in vivo. We also employed peritoneal elicited macrophages and RAW264.7 to assess the role of MAPK/JNK pathway in TMAO-induced formation of foam cells. Results: TMAO significantly promoted plaque progression in apoe-/- mice fed with high-fat diet for 8 weeks. Besides, macrophage recruitment, CD36 and proinflammatory cytokine expressions were enhanced by TMAO in plaque lesions. In vitro, TMAO increased the macrophage migration and the expression of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and ICAM1. In addition, CD36 expression and foam cell formation induced by ox-LDL were also enhanced by TMAO, which could be attenuated by siRNA-mediated knockdown of CD36. We additionally used MAPK inhibitor (SB230580) and JNK inhibitor (SP600125) to assess the MAPK/JNK pathway in TMAO-induced CD36 expression. Western blotting showed that both SB230580 and SP600125 could reduce the expression of CD36 induced by ox-LDL and TMAO. Moreover, SB230580 and SP600125 could also reduce the formation of foam cells. Conclusions: TMAO promotes the atherosclerosis in vivo and in vitro. CD36/MAPK/JNK pathway may play a crucial role in TMAO-induced formation of foam cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据