4.7 Article

Composite scaffolds loaded with bone mesenchymal stem cells promote the repair of radial bone defects in rabbit model

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 600-606

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.110

关键词

Silk fibroin; Chitosan; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells; Osteogenesis; Bone defect

资金

  1. Science and Technology plan projects in Guizhou province [[2016]1420]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81660367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of three-dimensional scaffolds of silk fibroin/chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite (SF/CS/nHA) and bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) on the repair of long segmental bone defects in rabbits. BMSCs were cultured with SF/CS/nHA in vitro, and cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity and Ca2+ content were examined. A 15 mm segmental defect in the radius was generated in 12 New Zealand White rabbits, which were divided randomly into three groups (n = 4): experimental group with SF/CS/nHA scaffold of induced BMSCs; control group with SF/CS/nHA scaffold; and blank group without any materials. Postoperatively at 12 weeks, osteogenesis effect and the degradation and absorption of SF/CS/nHA were evaluated by X-ray, hematoxylin eosin staining, and scanning electron microscopy. In vitro, SF/CS/nHA scaffolds exhibited good biocompatibility and no toxicity. SF/CS/nHA promoted adhesion, growth, and calcium nodule formation of BMSCs compared to control (P < 0.05). In vivo, we observed gradual new bone formation and bone defect gradually recovered at 12 weeks in experimental and control group, but more new bone was formed in experimental group (P < 0.05). In blank group, limited bone formation was observed and bone defect was obvious. In conclusion, SF/CS/nHA scaffolds loaded with BMSCs achieve high efficacy to repair segmental defect in the radius.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据